有一种批判说马克思的《资本论》不适用于他之后的时代,而另一方则一直致力于“创造性”地发展《资本论》。不过,这和我到目前为止进行的尝试~①并不相同。马克思当然没有考察过帝国主义、股份公司(资本和经营的分离)、金融资本、凯恩斯主义等事物;但是,这些果真是马克思根本没有想到的新奇事态吗?其实,在形式上,它们在产业资本主义确立之前就已经存在了。例如,列宁认为,帝国主义开始于19世纪末以资本输出为特征 There is a criticism that Marx’s “theory of capital” does not apply to his later era, while the other party has always been committed to “creatively” developing “capitalism.” However, this is not the same as what I have tried so far. Marx certainly did not examine such things as imperialism, joint-stock companies (the separation of capital and management), financial capital, Keynesianism, etc. However, are these really new developments that Marx simply did not expect? In fact, they are, formally, Just before its establishment was established. For example, Lenin believes that imperialism began in the late 19th century with the character of capital exports