论文部分内容阅读
自本刊1988年第3期开辟《档案馆工作与历史研究》专题讨论以来,已发表了6篇争鸣文章,作者从不同角度论述了自己的观点,对进一步开展讨论是很有帮助的。大家知道,档案馆工作与历史研究的关系,是我国当前档案馆工作中争议比较多的问题,究竟怎样正确理解和执行国家档案局颁发的《档案馆工作通则》、《关于开放历史档案的几点意见》中的有关规定?如何全面了解和正确理解周恩来总理关于档案工作的指示?如何看待我国档、史结合的历史传统?怎样处理档案馆的编研任务与外界利用档案的关系?“编研工作”在我国档案馆工作中的地位和作用,以及“编研工作”与档案馆工作整体工作的关系等等,就已发表的论文看,还不够广泛、深入。最近这方面的来稿较多,本刊因篇幅所限,除刊登一些比较长的文章外,使持有不同观点的文章都有发表的机会,现采用来稿摘编的办法,披露一些文章中不同观点,供同志们研究。
Since the publication of the special issue “Research on the Work and History of Archives”, No. 3, 1988, there have been six controversial articles published. The author discusses his point of view from different angles and is very helpful for further discussion. We all know that the relationship between archives work and historical research is a controversial issue in the current archives work in our country. How to correctly understand and implement the “General Rules of Archives Work” issued by the State Archives Bureau and “ How to deal with the relationship between the compilation and research mission of archives and the use of archives by the outside world? ”How to deal with the historical tradition of combining archives and history? Research work “in the work of the archives in our country and the relationship between” research work "and the overall work of the archives work, etc., to the published papers, is not yet broad enough and in-depth. More recent contributions in this area, due to space limitations, in addition to publishing some relatively long articles, so that have different views of the articles have the opportunity to publish, is the use of manuscript abstracts approach to disclose some of the different views of the article For my colleagues to study.