论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨妇科盆腔炎的临床诊断要点及有效治疗措施。方法:选取在该院妇科接受治疗的32例盆腔炎患者资料,医生在详细分析患者主诉、病史及辅助检查结果后,对患者疾病予以诊断。将这32例患者,随机平均分为两组,观察组采用甲硝唑、阿米卡星和头孢曲松三联用药方案,辅以微波治疗,对照组患者则采用肌注80万单位青霉素钠加以治疗,两组均连续治疗两周,对治疗效果和不良反应进行观察和比较。结果:两组患者经治疗后,观察组总有效率为93.75%,明显高于对照组总有效率为(75.00%,P<0.05)。两组患者总不良反应发生率均为12.50%,差异不显著(P>0.05)。结论:临床医生在接诊妇科盆腔炎患者后,应依据患者主诉、病史,体征及辅助检查结果等,对该病予以明确诊断,并制定有效的治疗措施。采用甲硝唑、阿米卡星和头孢曲松三联用药方案,辅以微波治疗,可有效治疗妇科盆腔炎,临床疗效较佳,不良反应发生率低,且较轻微,值得广泛推广应用。
Objective: To explore the clinical diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease and effective treatment measures. Methods: The data of 32 cases of pelvic inflammatory disease received gynecological treatment in our hospital were selected. The doctor diagnosed the patient’s disease after analyzing the patient’s main complaint, medical history and auxiliary examination results. The 32 patients were randomly divided into two groups, the observation group with metronidazole, amikacin and ceftriaxone triple drug regimen, supplemented by microwave treatment, the control group of patients with intramuscular injection of 800000 penicillin sodium Treatment, two groups were continuous treatment for two weeks, the treatment effect and adverse reactions were observed and compared. Results: After treatment, the total effective rate in the observation group was 93.75%, significantly higher than that in the control group (75.00%, P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in both groups was 12.50%, with no significant difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion: After receiving the patients with gynecological pelvic inflammatory disease, clinicians should make a definite diagnosis of the disease and make effective treatment measures based on the patients’ complaints, medical history, physical signs and auxiliary examination results. Metronidazole, amikacin and ceftriaxone triple drug regimen, combined with microwave treatment, can effectively treat gynecological pelvic inflammatory disease, better clinical efficacy, the incidence of adverse reactions is low, and minor, it is widely used.