论文部分内容阅读
目的探究功能性消化不良的危险因素以及饮食教育干预在功能性消化不良治疗中的作用。方法选取2013年11月~2015年11月寿光市人民医院收治的功能性消化不良患者88例作为本次研究的观察对象,将患者分为对照组和观察组,各44例。对照组患者接受常规护理,观察组患者则接受饮食教育干预,观察两组患者治疗的情况,分析消化不良的危险因素,并对比两组患者的治疗效果、心理状态以及患者的护理满意度。结果对照组治疗总有效率为75.00%,观察组治疗总有效率为93.18%,观察组患者治疗总有效率明显高于对照组;观察组患者护理后的SAS评分、SDS评分明显低于对照组;护理满意度(95.45%)明显高于对照组(79.55%)。两组间各数据差异较大,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论功能性消化不良的危险因素主要有不良的饮食习惯、生活习惯以及心理状态,对患者实施饮食教育干预能够有效提高患者治疗总有效率,缓解患者焦虑、抑郁的情绪,并且护理满意度较高,可推广使用。
Objective To explore the risk factors of functional dyspepsia and the role of diet education intervention in the treatment of functional dyspepsia. Methods Eighty-eight patients with functional dyspepsia admitted from November 2013 to November 2015 in Shouguang People’s Hospital were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into control group and observation group, 44 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received routine nursing care. Patients in the observation group received diet education interventions. The treatment of the two groups was observed. The risk factors of dyspepsia were analyzed. The therapeutic effects, psychological status and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of the control group was 75.00%, the total effective rate of the observation group was 93.18%. The total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group. The SAS scores and SDS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group ; Nursing satisfaction (95.45%) was significantly higher than the control group (79.55%). The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The main risk factors of functional dyspepsia are poor eating habits, living habits and psychological status. The intervention of diet education can effectively improve the total effective rate of treatment, relieve the anxiety and depression of patients, and the nursing satisfaction is high , Can promote the use.