论文部分内容阅读
2014年6月,在《最高人民法院关于审理食品药品纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》(以下简称《规定》)发布半年之后,北京市第一中级人民法院就沈某诉永辉超市销售过期食品一案作出终审判决,明确支持了沈某提出的10倍惩罚性赔偿请求。事实上,在1995年“王海打假”事件以后,知假买假现象日益频现,但在审判实践和法学理论中一直面临诸多争议。国家立法机关则一直对此采取回避态度,希望通过各地方的审判实践来探索立法经验。2013年12月,最高人民法院发布《规定》,并在第三条明确规定,“因食品、药品质量
In June 2014, after Beijing Sixth Intermediate People’s Court published Shenmou v. Yonghui Supermarket sales expiration of six months after the ”Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Food and Drug Dispute Cases“ (hereinafter referred to as the ”Regulations“), Food made a final judgment, clearly supported the Shen 10 times the 10 times the punitive claim for compensation. In fact, after the incident of ”Wanghai Crackdown“ in 1995, the phenomenon of buying and selling fake goods became more and more frequent. However, there have been many controversies in trial practice and legal theory. The national legislature has always taken the same attitude by avoiding this and hopes to explore the legislative experience through the trial practice in various places. In December 2013, the Supreme People’s Court promulgated the ”Provisions“ and clearly stipulated in Article 3 that ”because of the quality of food and medicines