论文部分内容阅读
由《类聚名贤乐府群玉》选录小令的情况,可以推知它存在增订的情况,天一阁旧藏蓝格影元钞本及其后的各种校本,当源于增订前较早的版本;增订本早佚,《乐府群珠》保存了增订本的部分面貌,尤其是不同于今本的部分格局。《乐府群玉》选录贯云石等人的小令甚少,但并非残缺所致。此外,今本有三处具体可指的残缺之处;卷三、卷四是否存在残缺均有可能。这些都纠正了隋树森校订本前言对该书残缺情况的判断。
The case of the small order made by the juxtaposition of juxtapositions of genres, Yinlefu, Qunyu can infer that there is an increase in the number of copies. Version; an updated version of the early Lost, “Yuefuhuzhu” save some of the face of the updated version, especially part of the pattern is different from this. The “Yuefu Qunyu” selection of records and other small orders little, but not incomplete. In addition, this book has three specific can refer to the incomplete; Volume III, Juan IV is incomplete there are possibilities. All these correct the judgments made by Sui Shu-sen on the incompleteness of the book.