论文部分内容阅读
隐性采访在当前的舆论监督活动中,能够比较全面、真实地反映事实真相,将那些见不得阳光的丑恶事件暴露在光天化日之下,从而使之受到正义的鞭挞,增强了新闻的真实感、现场感,使采访最大限度的逼近新闻事实。但是,这种采访采制的新闻公开发表后,有时也引起法律上的纠纷,甚至于被法院判决对被采访者进行经济的和精神的损害赔偿。隐性采访在法律和伦理层面上都有它必守的禁区。本文从隐性采访的合法性、隐性采访的法律规范、在法律上应当怎样看待和理解隐性采访,把握好新闻批评自由和人格权保护的界限,使其在法律许可的范围内进行,做了简要论述。
Covert Interview In the current public opinion supervision activities, we can more completely and truthfully reflect the truth and expose those ugly incidents that are not exposed to the sun in broad daylight, so that they are subject to the whipping of justice and enhance the realism of the news. The scene Sense, so that the interview to maximize the news fact. However, after the publicity of the news produced by this interview was published, it sometimes caused legal disputes and even caused the court to make economic and psychological damages to the interviewees. Covert interviews have legal and ethical aspects that they have to keep. This article from the legitimacy of implicit interviews, the legal norms of implicit interviews, how to treat and understand the hidden interviews in the law, grasp the boundaries of the freedom of the press criticism and the protection of personality rights, make it within the scope permitted by law, Made a brief discussion.