素有“修史”传统的中国人比谁都明白 :历史书写的线性特点和宏伟节奏恰恰来自于它对史实的以偏概全和挂一漏万。尽管没有人会把历史学当作叙事学的一个分支 ,但在具体的书写中 ,历史话语只能遵循特定的叙事线路去追溯历史 ,却是毫无疑问的 ;正因如此 ,历史的“选择”、“省略 The Chinese who have the history of “repairing history” know better than anyone else: the linear characteristics and grand rhythm of history writing come precisely from its partiality and omission of historical facts. Although no one would regard history as a branch of narratology, there is no question that historical discourse can only trace a specific narrative line in concrete writing. For this reason, the historical “choice ”," Omitted