论文部分内容阅读
我国是采票据行为相对无因性立法模式的国家,票据关系的直接前后手之间可以援引基础关系上的事由作为抗辩理由达到阻碍或消灭票据权利的效果。但在司法实践中,已经出现对通过区分法律规范之性质,从而否定无因性例外规则在直接前后手之间适用的动向。在法律规定明确且得到一贯适用的现状下,票据行为无因性被突破已是不争的事实。在司法实践中通过合理的抗辩理由认定对其适用作出限制,才是一条更为妥当的路径。
China is a country that adopts the relatively non-consensual legislation of negotiable instrument. The direct relationship between the negotiable instrument and the negotiable instrument can be used as a counter-justification to hinder or eliminate the right of negotiable instruments. However, in judicial practice, there has been a trend toward direct application of the rule of exception by negating the nature of legal norms. It is an indisputable fact that the promulgation of non-consensual behavior of negotiable instruments is clear in the legal provisions and has been consistently applied. It is a more appropriate path to find a restriction on its application through reasonable defense in judicial practice.