论文部分内容阅读
功能主义比较法理论认为比较法应针对具体的实际问题,探索各国法律在处理相同问题时的共同规则或差异,并为本国法律实践做好理论准备,而研究具体问题的最佳途径莫过案例比较。鉴于此,本刊曾于2012年第3期刊出“第三人惊吓损害侵权责任的比较研究”的案例比较研究系列论文。本期刊出的“第三人侵扰婚姻关系法律问题的比较研究”专题,系华东政法大学“比较民法与判例研究所”于近期组织学界同仁分别从德国、法国、意大利、英美、日本和我国台湾地区的法律实践和法学理论出发,对我国发生的一起第三人侵扰婚姻关系的案件裁判所进行的评析。期待这一研究能够为我国的司法实务和将来的立法改进提供理论支持,也特别感谢华东政法大学朱晓喆副教授在专题策划和组织撰写、赵文杰讲师在报告总结方面所做的努力和贡献。
The comparative law of functionalism holds that the comparative law should address specific practical problems and explore common rules or differences in the handling of the same issues in different countries and make theoretical preparations for their own legal practice. The best ways to study specific problems are not enough Compare In view of this, we published in the third issue of 2012 “Comparative study on third party scared damage infringement ” case comparison study series of papers. This issue of “third party intrusion on the legal issues of marital relations comparative study” topic, Department of East China University of Political Science and Law “Comparative Civil Law and Case Studies Institute” in recent organizational colleagues from Germany, France, Italy, Britain and the United States, Japan and Taiwan of our country, starting from the legal practice and legal theory, and making an assessment of the case tribunal of a third tribe intruding on the marriage relationship in our country. We hope that this research can provide theoretical support for our country’s judicial practice and future legislative improvement. We also especially thank Professor Zhu Xiaoshu, associate professor of East China University of Politics and Law for his planning and organization of the project. The lecturer Zhao Wenjie made his efforts and contributions in the report summary.