论文部分内容阅读
文学的历史作为历时性的文学叙事和价值厘定,它本应是在文学形态发生成长的本源处展开并最终完成的。但眼下一个显而易见的事实是,一种既定的理式和先在的本质主义观念,将本应居于主要或核心位置的文学事实变成了一个“他者”而被忽略或弃
As the diachronic literary narration and value determination, the history of literature is supposed to be started and finally completed at the origin of the growth of literary form. But for now the obvious fact is that an established rationale and a priorist notion of essence turn the literary fact that should have been in the main or central position into a "