在最高人民法院的司法解释增加了确认无效判决之后,该判决形式的适用案例十分罕见。一方面,我国法律中的“无效”规范的含义与行政法理论中的“无效”理论存在着偏差;另一方面,则源于相关法律规范的缺失。基于法律制度的缺陷,单纯的无效判决并不能达到保护相对人权益的预期效果。这需要在未来相关法律的制定、修改过程中对无效行政行为进行明确列举,并继续推进禁止判决的适用。 After the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court added the confirmation of invalid judgment, the application of the form of judgment is very rare. On the one hand, there is a deviation between the meaning of the “invalid” norms in our law and the “invalid” theory in administrative law theory; on the other hand, it is due to the lack of relevant legal norms. Based on the defects of the legal system, the simple invalid judgment can not achieve the expected effect of protecting the rights and interests of the relatives. This needs to make an explicit list of invalid administrative actions in the process of formulating and amending relevant laws in the future and continue to promote the application of the prohibition judgment.