论文部分内容阅读
面对错综复杂而又不断演进的经济世界,充满理性的实证主义者以选择性假设作为实证研究的逻辑起点的做法,为实证分析的范围和效果预设了局限性,体现为理论研究的狭隘性、碎片化和逻辑谬误三个方面的缺陷;作为分析工具的数理分析与经验检验未能解决这些问题,只是放大了问题的严重性。这种“实证”方法缺失了客观公正的求实精神与价值诉求。实证主义应以客观公正的价值取向与追求真理的精神,不惟形式化与经验至上,方能建构适应实践真正所需的方法与理论体系。
Confronted with the complicated and evolving economic world, rational positivists choose selective hypothesis as the logical starting point of empirical research, which presupposes the limitation of the scope and effect of empirical analysis and is characterized by the narrowness of theoretical research , Fragmentation and fallacy of logic; the mathematical analysis and empirical testing as an analytical tool fail to solve these problems, only amplifying the seriousness of the problem. This “empirical ” method lacks the objective and objective truth-seeking spirit and value appeal. Positivism should be objective and fair value orientation and the spirit of the pursuit of truth, not only formalization and the supremacy of experience, in order to construct the methods and theoretical system really needed to adapt to practice.