间接正犯与教唆犯的区别在国外学说林立,但在国内并未形成专门的论述,主要原因在于间接正犯尚未被我国立法承认。在遇到认识错误问题时,通说观点是将其归为教唆犯的认识错误进而继续讨论,但是这样忽略了间接正犯与教唆犯的本质不同。因此,对于间接正犯与教唆犯的区别有进行探究的必要。 Indirect principal and abettor differences in foreign doctrine everywhere, but did not form a special discussion in the country, mainly because of indirect criminals have not yet been recognized by our legislation. In the face of the problem of misunderstanding, the general point of view is that it is classified as an abettor’s misunderstanding and goes on to discuss it. However, this ignores the difference between indirect criminals and abettors. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the difference between indirect principal and abettor.