论文部分内容阅读
近日笔者在借阅本县民政部门2000年度火化记录作养老金反冒领例行检查时,赫然发现某乡退休医生张某在1999年7月死后,于2000年1月又“死”了一次。原来,县保险处于2000年1月发现退休医生张某已于1999年7月死亡火化,而所在单位仍旧在申报领取其养老金,便通知其单位把发放花名册拿来对帐。该单位先是借故回避,而后又不打自招地声称“没有冒领问题”。为了不扩大矛盾,便于日后工作,笔者没有言明是从民政部门查获,
Recently, when I borrowed the records of cremation records of the civil affairs department of this county for anti-counterfeiting checks in 2000, I found out that after the death of a retired doctor Zhang in July 1999 after “death” in January 2000, Once again It turned out that in January 2000, the County Insurance Department found that the retired doctor Zhang was cremated in July 1999, and the unit where he was still reporting his pensions would notify his unit of the reconciliation of the issued roster. The unit first excuse to avoid, and then never recruit to claim “did not take the lead ”. In order not to expand the contradiction and facilitate future work, the author did not say is seized from the civil affairs department,