论文部分内容阅读
在南京大屠杀过去75周年之际,以张宪文先生为首的南京的研究团队经过长时间的准备和研究,出版了《南京大屠杀全史》(张宪文主编,南京大学出版社2012年版)。近年来关于南京大屠杀问题的研究成果虽然可以用“汗牛充栋”来形容,不过这部全史却可以被看作是集大成之结果。无论在中国还是在日本,“南京大屠杀”问题都被许多人认为是中日历史认识分歧中极具代表性的问题之一,所以这部全史的出版,肯定会在各方面引起关注。本文不想就南京大屠杀事件本身的问题加以讨论,只想就《南京大屠杀全史》与南京大屠杀问题研究方法的关系阐明若干见解。
At the 75th anniversary of the massacre in Nanjing, the Nanjing research team led by Mr. Zhang Xianwen published the entire history of the Nanjing Massacre (edited by Zhang Xianwen and published by Nanjing University Press, 2012) after a long period of preparation and research. Although the research results on the Nanjing massacre in recent years can be described as “rich and varied”, this whole history can be regarded as the result of the integration. Both in China and Japan, the “Nanjing Massacre” issue has been considered by many to be one of the most representative issues in the history of Chinese and Japanese history of disagreement. Therefore, the publication of this whole history will surely be caused in all aspects attention. This article does not want to discuss the issue of the Nanjing massacre itself, just to clarify some opinions on the relationship between the “history of the Nanjing Massacre” and the research methods of the Nanjing Massacre.