论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨对于口腔溃疡采用不同方法治疗的临床效果并予以对比。方法选取河源市源城区埔前镇卫生院2013年1月-2014年1月收治的口腔溃疡患者76例作为研究对象,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。按照治疗方法将患者分为两组,一组用锡类散,设为对照组(36例),一组用思密达,设为观察组(40例),对比两组临床效果及复发情况。结果:对照组治疗总有效率为69.4%,明显低于观察组92.5%,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组愈合时间、年复发率与发作次数明显高于观察组,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对口腔溃疡患者采用思密达联合维生素治疗效果显著优于锡类散,可加快溃疡愈合,降低复发率与复发次数。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of different treatment methods for oral ulcer and to compare them. Methods A total of 76 oral ulcer patients admitted from January 2013 to January 2014 in Puqian Town Health Care Hospital, Heyuan City were selected as research objects, and their clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment method, the patients were divided into two groups. One group was treated with tin powder and the control group (36 cases). One group was treated with Smectite and the observation group (40 cases). The clinical effects and recurrence were compared between the two groups . Results: The total effective rate of the control group was 69.4%, which was significantly lower than that of the observation group (92.5%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05); the healing time, the annual recurrence rate and the number of attacks in the control group were significantly higher than those in the observation group There was significant difference between groups and between groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: The treatment of oral ulcer patients with Smecta combined with vitamins was significantly better than tin powder, can accelerate the healing of ulcers, reduce the recurrence rate and the number of relapse.