论文部分内容阅读
在当前社会语境下,司法公正与新闻自由之间的博弈始终是一个历久弥新的话题。司法公正是社会政治民主、进步的重要标志,新闻自由是新闻媒体机构赖以生存的基石,两者都是推动社会进步发展的原动力,公正往往通过程序体现,自由则必须恪守一定的维度,体现了新闻自由之精神的媒体报道超越了其伦理底线就可能会影响司法公正。通过对李某某案的深度剖析,旨在明确在本案中,包括报刊、广播、电视、新闻机构和网络媒体在内的媒体报道对刑事司法公正是否施加了影响,以及影响的程度、范围、途径、机制,并在应然层面上探讨建构两者间的平衡。
In the current social context, the game between judicial justice and freedom of the press has always been a topic of renewed love. Judicial fairness is an important symbol of social and political democracy and progress. Freedom of the press is the cornerstone of the survival of news media organizations. Both are the motive force for promoting social progress and development. Justice is often demonstrated through procedures. Freedom must adhere to certain dimensions and manifest itself Media coverage of the spirit of freedom of the press beyond its ethical bottom line may affect the administration of justice. Through an in-depth analysis of Lee’s case, the article aims to make clear whether media reports, including newspapers, radio, television, news organizations and online media, exert an influence on the fairness of criminal justice and the extent and scope of the impact in this case. Ways, mechanisms, and in the appropriate level to explore the construction of the balance between the two.