论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对汉语比拟式历史的考察和分析，梳理了它的发展轨迹和脉络。作者认为，在考察历史语言现象时，有时须跳出历史比较法的框框，从语言渗透、语言融合的角度去把握。元明时期的比拟式正应如此解释。金元时期出现了与先秦唐宋完全不同的新的句式和语法功能，这种句式不是汉语原有句式的继承和发展，而是受阿尔泰语（主要是蒙古语）语法影响而产生的。它经过了从模仿照搬到逐步调整、改造，从而纳入汉语语法体系的过程，是在特定历史社会条件下语言接触、渗透和融合的产物。而现代汉语的比拟式则充分地体现了语言渗透和融合的结果：上述两种比拟式的形式融为一体，两种语法功能也兼而有之。
Through the investigation and analysis of the comparative Chinese history, this paper combs its development track and context. The author believes that when examining the phenomenon of historical language, sometimes it is necessary to jump out of the framework of the historical comparative law and grasp it from the perspectives of language penetration and language integration. Yuan and Ming Dynasties should be so interpreted. During Jin and Yuan Dynasties, a completely different sentence and grammatical function appeared from that of the pre-Qin and Tang Dynasties. This sentence pattern was not inherited and developed by the original Chinese sentence patterns but was generated by the grammar of the Altaic language (mainly Mongolian) of. It has gone through the process of imitating and copying to gradually adjusting and reforming to integrate into the Chinese grammar system. It is a product of language contact, infiltration and integration under certain historical and social conditions. The analogy of modern Chinese fully embodies the result of language penetration and integration: the above two analogy forms are integrated, and the two kinds of grammatical functions are combined.