论文部分内容阅读
日本学者铃木虎雄首倡的“魏晋文学自觉说”并不是一个科学的论断,而鲁迅先生接受这一说法本是一种有感而发,虽然具有一定的学术启发性,但是不能把它上升为一种文学史规律性的理论判断。“汉代文学自觉说”是对“魏晋文学自觉说”的一个有力挑战,从汉魏以来“功利主义”与“文学自觉”、汉人的“个体意识”与抒情文学的关系来看,促进汉魏以来中国中古文学发展变化的根本原因是秦汉社会制度的变革、文人阶层的出现及其特殊的文化心态,以及他们对于文学的基本态度。以此为基础,可以清晰地看到从汉到唐的中国文学的演变轨迹。“魏晋文学自觉说”不能全面地描述中国中古文学的发展过程,它影响了我们对于中国文学发展规律和本质特征的认识,因而在中国中古文学研究中不适宜使用“文学自觉”这一概念。
The “Literary Consciousness of Wei and Jin Dynasties” advocated by Japanese scholar Suzuki Toshio was not a scientific conclusion. This idea was accepted by Mr. Lu Xun as a kind of sensation but with certain academic enlightenment, but it can not be raised to A Theoretical Judgment of the Regularity of Literary History. “Consciousness of the Han Dynasty Literature” is a powerful challenge to the “Consciousness of Literature in Wei and Jin Dynasties.” From the relationship between “utilitarianism” and “literary consciousness” and the “individual consciousness” of Han people since the Han and Wei Dynasties and lyric literature, Since the Wei Dynasty, the fundamental reason for the development and change of Chinese medieval literature is the change of the social system in Qin and Han dynasties, the appearance of literati and its special cultural mentality and their basic attitude to literature. Based on this, we can clearly see the evolution of Chinese literature from Han to Tang. “The Consciousness of Wei and Jin Literary Theory” can not fully describe the development process of Chinese medieval literature. It affects our understanding of the laws and essential characteristics of the development of Chinese literature. Therefore, it is not appropriate to use the concept of “literary conscience” in the study of Chinese ancient literature .