论文部分内容阅读
典型案例王某在某超市购买木筷5 0包,每包40元。未来几日内,王某接连购买上述木筷1000余包。上述木筷每包内含木筷10双,标注保质期为2年。王某主张该木筷标注的材质属于红木,但经鉴定材质与标注不符,认为超市存在虚假宣传,构成欺诈,要求超市退货退款并支付货款3倍的赔偿。超市主张王某并非为“生活消费目的”购买商品,该案不适用《消法》。王某称其购买木筷的原因系收藏和送人。
Typical case Wang buy 50 chopsticks in a supermarket package, 40 yuan per pack. The next few days, Wang successively purchased the chopsticks more than 1,000 packages. The chopsticks each package contains 10 pairs of chopsticks, marked shelf life of 2 years. Wang claimed that the wood chopsticks marked the material belongs to mahogany, but the identification of material inconsistent with the label that the supermarket there is false propaganda, fraudulent, requiring the supermarket to return a refund and pay 3 times the payment of compensation. Wang argued that the supermarket is not “for consumer purposes” to buy goods, the case does not apply “consumer law.” Wang said the reason for buying chopsticks collection and give away.