论文部分内容阅读
目次一、案情二、裁判三、评析一、案情原告:北大方正集团公司(下称北大方正公司)。原告:北京红楼计算机科学技术研究所(下称红楼研究所)。被告:北京高术天力科技有限公司(下称高术天力公司)。被告:北京高术技术公司(下称高术公司)。原告北大方正公司和红楼研究所为方正RIP、方正文合等计算机软件的著作权人。通过调查,两原告怀疑被告高术天力公司和高术公司有制售上述软件的嫌疑。自2001年6月起,原告北大方正公司就委派其下属公司
Table of Contents I. Case II. Referees III. Analysis I. Case Plaintiff: Peking University Founder Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Peking University Founder). Plaintiff: Beijing Red House Computer Science and Technology Institute (hereinafter referred to as Red House Institute). Defendant: Beijing High Technology Tianli Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as High Technology Tianli Company). Defendant: Beijing High Technology Company (hereinafter referred to as High Technology Company). Plaintiff Founder Founder and Red House Institute Founder RIP, Founder of equal computer software copyright owners. Through the investigation, the two plaintiffs suspect that the defendant, Gao Tiantian and high-tech companies suspect the sale of the above software. Since June 2001, the plaintiff, Founder Founder, has assigned its subsidiaries