论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同采血方法在血液常规检验中的临床结果。方法 100例健康体检者随机分为实验组和对照组,每组50例。对照组采用末梢血采集法进行采集,实验组采用静脉采血的方法进行采集。对比两组检测结果。结果实验组中白细胞(WBC)、红细胞(RBC)、血红蛋白(HGB)、红细胞比容(HCT)及血小板(PLT)的检验值明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组的平均红细胞比容(MCV)、平均红细胞血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)检验值明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),实验组平均红细胞蛋白含量(MCH)与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论静脉采血与末梢血采血方法相比,结果存在差异性,而静脉采血检测结果与标准值比较差异小,静脉采血具有极高的稳定性,临床上更值得推广。
Objective To investigate the clinical results of different blood sampling methods in routine blood tests. Methods 100 healthy subjects were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, 50 cases in each group. The control group was collected by peripheral blood collection method, and the experimental group was collected by venous blood collection method. Compare the two test results. Results The test values of WBC, RBC, HGB, HCT and PLT in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P <0.05). The test group’s mean hematocrit (MCV) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCHC) test values were significantly lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05), the experimental group average erythrocyte protein content (MCH) compared with the control group , The difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). Conclusions The results of venous blood sampling and peripheral blood sampling are different. However, the results of venous blood sampling are quite different from the standard values, and venous blood sampling is highly stable and clinically worthy of promotion.