论文部分内容阅读
在信用证业务中,开证行伙同进口商,无理挑剔单据甚至非单据性不符点的案例屡见不鲜。这种国际贸易中的欺诈和不公正行为,给银行结算增添了混乱,违背了UCP500的严肃性和国际商会的规定,本文通过以下案例对此作一探讨。案例经过 1997年5月9日,某受益人向A行交单议付一套信用证单据,开证行为B行,偿付行为C行,L/C对通知行的规定有一特殊条款:
In the L / C business, it is not uncommon for the issuing bank to co-operate with importers, unreasonable or fussy documents or even non-material discrepancies. This fraudulent and unjust act of international trade has added confusion to bank settlement, contrary to the seriousness of the UCP 500 and the provisions of the International Chamber of Commerce. This article examines this issue through the following examples. Case On May 9, 1997, a beneficiary submitted a bill of lading to Bank A for negotiation of a set of L / C documents, issuing bank B, reimbursement bank C, and L / C had a special provision for the advising bank: