论文部分内容阅读
辩护思路马伊已经年满18岁,没有精神病(侦查机关已经作了司法精神病鉴定),没有主动投案自首,没有积极对被害人家属进行赔偿,在侦查阶段开始的时候没有如实供述……等等。总之,没有一点法律上的从轻或减轻处罚的条件。难道我在法庭上说他因为爱情而杀人就该从轻处罚吗?在看过检察院向法院提交的主要证据之后,我确定了从主观恶性和社会危害性的角度来辩护的思路。按该思路辩护,本案中
Defense law Mai has been 18 years of age, no mental illness (investigative agencies have been identified in judicial psychiatry), did not take the initiative to surrender, did not actively compensate the families of the victims, at the beginning of the investigation stage without a truthful statement ... and so on. In short, there is no legal basis to reduce or mitigate the conditions. Did I say in court that he should be leniently punished for killing because of love? After reading the main evidence presented by the Public Prosecutor’s Office to the court, I decided to defend myself from the perspective of subjectivity and social harm. According to the idea of defense, the case