论文部分内容阅读
在世纪之交的鲁迅研究语境中,我们确实看到了许多“经典”论著的问世,它们以严谨、客观、真实、深刻的研究态度,逼近了鲁迅先生人格和文格的精髓和纵深,再现了20世纪东方民族的伟大精魂。然而,谁又能忘记某些学术新锐挖苦、嘲讽鲁迅先生的惊人之论?鲁迅真的是一个阴鸷、刻薄、不近人情的老头子吗?近日翻阅《鲁迅日记》,读到其中大量关于萧军的记载,不由对这些前卫宜言生发了诸多感喟,并产生了难以消解的疑问。应该承认,对今天的中国现代文学史和当下的读者来说,萧军从辽西大山的褶皱中冲上文坛,从武学走向文学,从一介武夫成为著名作家,似乎已经消散了神秘的色彩和传奇的光环——他对中国乃至世界反法西斯文学的独特贡献,他对东北作家群
In the context of Lu Xun’s research at the turn of the century, we did see the advent of many “classical” treatises. They approached the essence and depth of Lu Xun’s personality and style with rigorous, objective, realistic and profound research attitudes. Reproduce the great spirit of the 20th century oriental nation. However, who can forget some of the cutting-edge academic sarcasm, ridiculed the anomaly of Mr. Lu Xun? Lu Xun really is a yin yang, harsh, unfriendly old man? Recently read “Lu Xun diary,” read a lot about Xiao Jun The records, could not help to these avant-garde gave birth to a lot of feelings, and produced a difficult question to digest. It should be admitted that for today’s modern Chinese literary history and current readers, Xiao Jun rushed into the literary world from the folds of western Liaoning and moved from martial art to literature. From a martial arts husband to a well-known writer, Xiao Jun seems to have dissipated the mysterious colors and The aura of legends - his unique contribution to anti-fascist literature in China and the world. His contribution to the group of northeast writers