论文部分内容阅读
后现代主义针对现代性发展所带来的各种危机和后果,把批判的矛头指向了西方形而上学的理性传统,指向形而上学本质主义、普遍主义、基础主义的宏大叙事式认知模式。然而,致力于对事物和人类实践存在的终极本质进行批判与沉思的形而上学理性,如何承载后现代主义对现代性实践后果的多重责难?本文就此试图澄清,后现代主义的批判矢的,到底是科学主义理性还是形而上学理性,或者说是感染了科学主义的形而上学理性。
Postmodernism aimed at the various crises and consequences brought about by the development of modernity pointed the criticism to the rational tradition of Western metaphysics and pointed to the grand narrative cognitive model of metaphysical essentialism, universalism and fundamentalism. However, the metaphysical rationality of criticizing and meditating on the ultimate nature of the existence of things and human practices, and how to carry post-modernism’s multiple censure of the consequences of modernity? In this paper, we try to clarify that the critique of postmodernism is, in the end, Scientism is still rational metaphysics, or is infected with scientism metaphysical reason.