基于对斯里兰卡一个海啸侵袭后的村庄的民族志考察,本文探讨了灾难管理的两面神特质——“仍有脆弱性,但已具弹韧性”。在海啸灾后重建中,各种人道主义机构与项目基于社区灾难管理理念,强调培养村庄的弹韧性,而其所采用的方法、视野与措施却是极其模糊多样的,于是在具体实践中,不仅充满着围绕弹韧性和脆弱性的争论,而且各个重建参与者对这对概念及其关系也有不同的理解与体现。在这样一出“社会戏剧”中,为吸引进一步的援助,村民们努力在两面神的“脆弱性”与“弹韧性”之中寻精巧的平衡将弹韧性的程度展演得恰如其分,以给脆弱性留以足够余地。最后,本文强调,对灾难管理中弹韧性和脆弱性的人类学讨论,须将之放在地方的历史性中去理解其多重面向,同时揭示其中包含的冲突表达与政治意涵。 Based on an ethnographic review of a tsunami-hit village in Sri Lanka, this article explores the two-sided trait of disaster management - “still fragile but resilient.” In the post-tsunami reconstruction, various humanitarian agencies and projects are based on the concept of community-based disaster management and emphasize developing the resilience of villages. However, the methods, visions and measures adopted by them are extremely vague and diversified. Therefore, in practice, not only It is full of controversy surrounding resilience and vulnerability, and various reconstruction participants also have different understandings and manifestations of these concepts and their relationships. In such a “social drama,” in order to attract further assistance, the villagers struggled to find a playful balance between the “vulnerability” and the “resilience” Exactly enough to leave enough room for vulnerability. Finally, the paper emphasizes that the anthropological discussion on resilience and vulnerability in disaster management needs to be based on the historicity of the place, to understand its multiple aspects and to reveal the conflicting expressions and political implications.