论文部分内容阅读
本文第一部分从问题导向入手,探讨裁判文书公共性与法治中国建设三个层面的对接需要,揭示当前裁判文书说理模式与公共价值之间的现实分歧。第二部分从原因分析切入,从公共说理的“逻辑”和“情绪”、“信誉”三要素,通过具体实例,展示现有裁判文书公共价值上的不足。第三部分着力于构建裁判文书公共性及其价值的实现路径,从借助社会常识解读存在争议的法律阴影地带,使用日常用语代换晦涩难懂的法律术语,转换大众视角纠正精英意识造成的态度偏差等三个方面,提出从单向灌输到平等对话的公共说理角色建构路径。
The first part of this article starts with problem orientation and discusses the need of docking between the publicity of the judicial instruments and the construction of the rule of law in China, revealing the current differences between the mode of judgment instruments and the public value. The second part analyzes the reasons from the analysis. From the three elements of “Logic ” and “Emotion ” and “Reputation ” of public reasoning, this article shows the deficiencies in the public value of the existing judicial instruments through concrete examples. The third part focuses on constructing the commonality and value of referee instruments. From the common law interpretation of the controversial legal shadow zone, the use of everyday expressions to replace the obscure legal terms, the conversion of public opinion to correct the attitude of elite consciousness Deviation and other three aspects, put forward from one-way inculcation to equal public dialogue dialectical construction path.