论文部分内容阅读
马:小可拙作《文人画论》只是戏说,不敢以学人形式细论,不从摩诘讲起,主要是摩诘之画,多见于画论或自作诗,当然摩诘音律一样据说很好,但是画史所存“辋川图”真假难辨,如北宋时米芾所争论的李成是否存在的问题一样。东坡作画与论画史料较多可以确定,当然只是一家之言。台湾学人中李敖读的较多,虽然刻薄,然其考据功力我喜欢,现在国内读书细致的人确实凤毛麟角,大学期间徐复观,钱穆,也是浅读一二,新儒家学说个人比较喜欢,台湾学者有一点是好的,就是温和内敛,不像国内学者学的都是显学。现在国内不论社会状态还是学术都要求短平快,所以经历这么多年,美学研究出不了李泽厚的圈子,哲学只有跟着西方屁股后面跑,东方哲学的美感也只能靠旅美学者杜维明发掘的儒家哲学。我这辈学识浅薄,也就多看看,待以后给自己的孩子多多买些书读一读,哈哈。
Ma: Xiao Ke can be as “literati painting theory” is just a joke, not dare to scholars in the form of detail, not from the Momo speaking, mainly Mamo paintings, more common in painting theory or self-poetry, of course, Very good, but the history of painting stored, “Wang Chuan map ” true and false can not be distinguished, as the Northern Song Dynasty Mi Chang argued the existence of the same problem. Dongpo painting and drawing more historical material can be determined, of course, just one of the words. Li Ao in Taiwan scholars read more, though mean, but its textual research skills I like, and now very few people studying fine indeed, Xu Fuguan University, Qian Mu, also shallow reading 12, Neo-Confucianism personally prefer to Taiwan scholars One thing is good, that is, gentle restraint, unlike the domestic scholars are learning. Nowadays, regardless of the state of the society or the academic requirements in both China and the rest of the world, the experience of so many years can not be deduced from the circle of Li Ze-hou by aesthetics. Only by running behind the western butt can the philosophy of Oriental philosophy be confined to the Confucian philosophy unearthed by Du Wei-ming. I know this generation of superficial knowledge, but also more to see, to be more children to buy some books to read later, ha ha.