论文部分内容阅读
将《孟子》一书中的譬喻作为一种哲思的话语方式而不是限于作为一种语言的修辞手段对之进行解读。通过柏拉图的洞穴之喻的对照以期阐明孟子运用譬喻的方式,关于其方式孟子恰是承夫子“能近取譬”之绪。正是这一“能近取譬”之则使得孟子时时立足于其所置身的生活世界以及通过具体之象去传达其学说。最后,我们将会发现在孟子的思想世界中生活世界(作为立足点)、譬喻(作为话语方式)、学说(思想)是三者一如的。
To interpret the metaphor in Mencius as a philosophical discourse rather than as a rhetorical device of one language. Through the comparison of Platonic cave metaphor to clarify Mencius’s method of using metaphor, Mencius is just about the way of Cheng Fuzi’s “can take the analogy”. It is this “can get analogy ” the rule makes Mencius from time to time based on their exposure to the living world and through specific images to convey their doctrine. Finally, we will find living world (as a foothold) in Mencius’s intellectual world, metaphor (as discourse) and doctrine (thinking) as the three.