论文部分内容阅读
到目前为止,美加“软木案”之所以会受到关注,是由于其所涉及的巨大经济利益、诉讼过程的跨度和复杂程度,以及各国内及国际法庭所作出的各种裁决对学术的启示。而本文想要证明的是,“软木案”最重要的价值体现在别的地方。对于贸易法学者来说,“软木案”之所以会引起他们的兴趣,是因为该案揭示了目前国际贸易法体系所面临的三个挑战:国际贸易法体系可能会被一个由区域和双边条约组成的“大杂烩”体系所取代;国际贸易法规范在国内法院的地位;以及强权国家的选择性履行和迟延履行问题。同时,这些挑战也是国际公法领域面临的三个核心挑战的体现,即国际法的碎片化、数量激增的国际法庭间的关系以及国际关系法律化的局限。
So far, the reason why the “Cork Case” has attracted the attention of the United States, Canada and the United States is due to the huge economic interests involved, the span and complexity of the litigation process, and the various rulings made by various national and international tribunals on academic Inspiration. What the paper wants to prove is that the most important value of “cork case” is reflected in other places. The reason why “cork case” is of interest to trade law scholars is that the case reveals the three challenges that the current system of international trade law is facing: the system of international trade law may be replaced by a system of regional and The “hodgepodge” system of bilateral treaties; the status of the law of international trade law in domestic courts; and the issue of the selective and delayed performance of power states. At the same time, these challenges are also manifestations of the three core challenges facing public international law: the fragmentation of international law, the proliferation of international tribunals and the legalization of international relations.