“我们对自己智力工作中想当作工具用的那些术语,可以随意界定。唯一的问题是它们是否将符合我们打算达到的理论目的。一个在范围上大体和习惯用法相符合的法律概念,在其他情况相同时,比一个只能适用于很狭窄现象的概念显然要好些。”~([1])由是,欲最大化对私权客体概念定义的描述、解释功能,使之具有充分的分析价值,其定义方式须是描述性而非构成 “We are free to define those terms that we want to use as a tool in our intellectual work, and the only question is whether they will fit the theoretical purpose we intend to achieve: a legal concept that is broadly in line with customary usage, In other cases, it is obviously better than a concept which can only be applied to very narrow phenomena. ”Therefore, to maximize the description of the definition of the concept of private rights and to explain its function, Adequate analytical value, its definition must be descriptive rather than constitutional