论文部分内容阅读
学界往往使用《汉书·赵广汉传》中的相关记载证明汉代触犯“乏军兴”之罪,当被处以腰斩。通过研读相关史料,可以发现尉史禹被处腰斩与为吏“故不直”之罪有关与“乏军兴”无关,且“诬人反坐(其罪)”这一法律原则并不适用于死刑。因此《汉书·赵广汉传》中的相关记载,并不能证明触犯“乏军兴”之罪者当处以腰斩。
The academic circles often use the related records in “Han Guang Zhao Han Han Biography” to prove that the Han violated the crime of “lack of military rejuvenation” and was punished. Through the study of relevant historical materials, we can see that Wei Shi Yu is being punished and has nothing to do with the crime of “insult” and “lack of military rejuvenation”, and “framed anti-sit-offs” A legal principle does not apply to the death penalty. Therefore, “Han Guang Zhao Chuan Han,” the relevant records, and can not prove that infringes the “lack of military Xing” should be cut.