论文部分内容阅读
目的:结合临床实际探讨丙型病毒性肝炎的最佳检测方法。方法:选择2011年2月-2014年1月于我院门诊及住院的患者共计210例为研究对象,收集血清学标本,采用酶联免疫法和胶体金法检测,对比二者检测率的差异。结果:两种检测方法在发现丙型肝炎病人的阳性率差异无统计学意义。结论:两种方法均可应用于临床检查丙型肝炎,但胶体金法有操作简单快捷、时间短、结果直观、无需特殊的设备等优点,可作为临床筛查、预防及复查丙型肝炎病人的首选方法,适合在基层医院推广。
OBJECTIVE: To explore the best detection method of hepatitis C with clinical practice. Methods: A total of 210 outpatients and hospitalized patients in our hospital from February 2011 to January 2014 were enrolled in this study. Serological samples were collected and detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and colloidal gold assay . Results: There was no significant difference between the two detection methods in the detection of positive rate of hepatitis C patients. Conclusion: Both of the two methods can be used in clinical examination of hepatitis C. However, the colloidal gold method has the advantages of simple and quick operation, short time, intuitive result and no special equipment, which can be used as a clinical screening, prevention and review of hepatitis C patients The preferred method, suitable for promotion in primary hospitals.