深圳佛山历史上都曾基于不同的背景和政策开始了“农地入市”的探索,积累了宝贵的经验。文章认为通过对两地“农地入市”制度的比较,可以发现深圳市的思路反映了深圳对土地历史问题的态度,由于深圳市政府历史上已有较大投入,因此利益平衡点倾向于政府一边,未来改革的突破点在于利益的平衡。而佛山的改革经历了从困惑期到获得立法机关授权的过程,未来的试点代表着全国农村集体建设用地上市交易的改革方向,佛山不断完善农村集体组织的管理和决策,为我国农地入市的政策设计积累经验。 Foshan, Foshan history have all based on different backgrounds and policies began “” into the market “exploration, and accumulated valuable experience. The article thinks that comparing the two places ”farmland entering the market " system, we can find that Shenzhen ’s train of thought reflects Shenzhen ’ s attitude toward the history of land. Since the Shenzhen municipal government has made great investment in history, the balance of interest tends to On the government side, the breakthrough point of future reforms lies in the balance of interests. The reform of Foshan has gone through the period of confusion to obtain the authorization of the legislature. The pilot program in the future represents the reform direction of listing and trading of rural collective construction land in the country. Foshan constantly improves the management and decision-making of rural collective organizations, Policy design and accumulated experience.