唐兰先生在20世纪40-50年代两次刊布对石鼓文的研究成果。从石鼓文的内容、语汇、字形、书法等方面推定其时代当在战国中叶秦公簋之后、诅楚文之前。黄奇逸《石鼓文年代及相关诸问题》认为,由于唐文对关键句子“天子□来,嗣王始□”的误断,导致唐氏对石鼓文绝对年代的误断。本文指出,目前所刊布的新成果、新认识虽有一定的说服力,但要修改唐兰先生已有的结论,材料尚不充分。 In the 1940s and 1950s, Mr. Tang Lan published his research on stone drum writing twice. It is presumed from the content, vocabulary, shape, calligraphy and other aspects of the stone drum writing that its era should be preceded by the publication of the Qin court after the middle of the Warring States Period and the curse of Chu. Huang Qiyi’s “Years of Stone and Drum Manuscripts and Related Issues” held that due to Tang’s mistaking of the key sentence of “Son of Heaven”, “Wang Si Shi □” led to Tang’s erroneous judgment on the absolute age of stone drum prose. This article points out that although there are some persuasive new achievements and new understandings published so far, it is still not enough to amend the conclusions already made by Mr. Tang Lan.