论文部分内容阅读
文章从《现代汉语词典》(第7版)、《现代汉语规范词典》(第3版)、《现代汉语学习词典》《商务馆学汉语词典》中共提取了66条“有+名”类词进行了研究,发现其中部分词或词的义项在不同词典中存在词性标注分歧,有的还存在词标注与释义、用例域上不一致的现象,而这些分歧主要集中在动词与形容词。通过分析,文章发现分歧的根源在于该类词中“有”的多义性和名词性语素的复杂语义。基于此,文章尝试性地提出了一套针对“有+名”类词词性的判定方案,即结合动-形量化标准、语义辨析和大规模语料库的语料验证来确定存在分歧的“有+名”类词的词性。此外文章还对其中部分形容词提出了增加深层义的阐释以及改进相关配例的建议。
The article has extracted 66 “+ have +” from “Modern Chinese Dictionary” (7th edition), “Modern Chinese Standardization Dictionary” (3rd edition), “Modern Chinese Learning Dictionary” It has been found that there are some differences of part of speech in some lexicons in some lexicons or in other lexicons. Some of them also have the phenomenon of inconsistencies in word annotation, paraphrase and use cases, which are mainly in verbs and adjectives. Through the analysis, the article finds that the root of the disagreement lies in the complex semantics of polysemy and nominal morpheme in this kind of word. Based on this, the article tries tentatively to put forward a set of judgment scheme for the part-of-speech of “有 + 名 ” category, that is to say, combining with the quantification standard of moving-form, semantic analysis and corpus verification of large-scale corpus, Have + name "category of part of speech. In addition, the article also puts forward some suggestions to increase some of the deep adjectives and improve the related examples.