论文部分内容阅读
袁枚《随园诗话》刊布以来,流传极广,为治清代诗学者案头必备,然此书关于赵执信《谈龙录》的评述却令人费解。王士禛与赵执信的论诗之争是清初诗坛上的著名事件,赵执信的《谈龙录》对王士禛的人品、学问、诗歌、诗学极尽嘲讽。而袁枚却说读《谈龙录》后,觉得赵、王论诗“无甚9牾”。此种言论显系误解《谈龙录》,不符合事实。袁枚误解的原因,当是袁枚所读《谈龙录》为卢见曾雅雨堂删节本。乾隆间,两淮盐运使卢见曾以乡邦后学身份刊刻《谈龙录》,为调和王、赵分歧,尽删赵执信攻讦王士禛之言。此种删节本“于执信著书之意,全相乖忤,殊失其真”。雅雨堂本《谈龙录》使袁枚产生误解,流弊及于今人,故亟需探清辨明,以杜误说。
Since the publication of Yuan Mei’s “Poetry with the Garden”, Yuan’s poem has become an indispensable tool for the handling of poets and scholars in the Qing Dynasty. However, the book’s commentary on Zhao Zhixin’s Tan Long recorded is puzzling. The dispute between Wang Shizhen and Zhao Zhixin on poetry is a well-known event in the poetry world of early Qing Dynasty. Zhao Zhixin’s Tan Long recorded extremely ridiculed Wang Shizhen’s character, knowledge, poetry and poetics. Yuan Mei said after reading “talk about the Dragon Record”, I feel Zhao, Wang’s poem “no 9 ”. Such remarks clearly misunderstood “talk about the dragon record,” does not conform to the facts. Yuan Mei misunderstanding the reason, when read by Yuan Mei, “talk about the Dragon Record” as Lu see Zen Accord deleted the book. Qianlong, between the two Huai Yun Lu Zeng Zeng had state identity after the publication of “talk about the dragon record”, to reconcile the king, Zhao differences, to delete the Zhao Zhixin attack Wang Shizhi words. This deletion of this “in the faith of the letter of the book, all the good, lost the truth ”. Ya Yu Tang Ben “talk about the Dragon,” Yuan Mei misunderstanding, abuses and present-day people, it is imperative to find out clearly to Du mistake.