论文部分内容阅读
从哲学的视角,对《诗经》中的《黍离》一诗进行了全新的解读,认为诗的三章反复抒写的都是作者对生命本体存在的追问,表达的不是过去历史学家所认为的西周大臣经过宗周宗庙宫室时的感时伤事、忧国怀家的情感,或者是一般文学史上已成定论的亡国之痛的内容,而是作者借禾黍的生长状况托物起兴,在中国诗歌中首次提出“我是谁”这一哲学命题,在历史的、文学的解读之外,为此诗提供了新的解读路径。
From a philosophical point of view, we have completely read the poem “Millet” in The Book of Songs and hold the view that the three chapters of the poem repeatedly describe the author’s questioning of the existence of life ontology. The expression is not what historians think in the past Of the Western Zhou Minister after the case of Zhou Zongmiao palace feeling when the injury, worried about the feelings of the Huai family, or the general history of literature has become a culprit painful country, but the author by the growth of millet millet , The philosophical proposition “Who am I” first proposed in Chinese poetry provides a new interpretation path for this poem besides historical and literary interpretation.