论文部分内容阅读
郜元宝认为,今天仍然弥漫着鲁迅与之搏斗的各种“文字游戏”;只有在“文字游戏”停止的地方,我们才可能与鲁迅真实相遇,才会发现,原来他是怎样的无法绕过。孙郁认为,浙东文化对鲁迅早期思想和精神底色有多方面的辐射,而鲁迅的现代眼光则颠覆了这一传统并赋予浙东文化另一种隐含。刘绪源认为,《两地书》是仅次于《野草》的、最能反映本真的鲁迅的书,那种把对虚无与黑暗的反抗作为生命本体的实践,和“察见渊鱼者不祥”的自省,是理解鲁迅的一把重要钥匙。袁盛勇认为,鲁迅思想及其话语实践中的正面和负面因素是难以分割地联系在一起的,应采取一种辩证的态度,回到一个复杂而完整的鲁迅那里。张钊贻则认为,鲁迅早期“反民主”言论有其历史原因,并非反对民主的理念,他对目前的民主制度能否真正实现确有怀疑,根源在于两种现代性的矛盾理念。
Yuan Bao believes that today is still filled with all kinds of Lu Xun wrestling “word game”; only in the “text game ” stop where we may actually encounter with Lu Xun, we will find that he is how Can not be bypassed Sun Yu believes that eastern Zhejiang culture radiated many aspects of Lu Xun’s early thoughts and spiritual background, while Lu Xun’s modern vision subverted this tradition and gave the eastern Zhejiang culture another implication. According to Liu Xuyuan, “The Two Books” is the book that best reflects Lu Xun, second only to “weeds,” the practice of using the resistance to nothingness and darkness as the body of life, and “ Ominous ”introspection, is an important key to understand Lu Xun. According to Yuan Shengyong, the positive and negative factors in Lu Xun’s thought and his discourse practice are inextricably linked. He should adopt a dialectical attitude and return to a complex and complete Lu Xun. Zhang Zhaoyi believes that the early “anti-democracy” speech of Lu Xun had its historical reasons and was not an objection to the idea of democracy. He really doubts whether the current democratic system can really be realized, but lies at the root of two conflicting ideas of modernity.