论文部分内容阅读
我院内科自1974年1月开始使用呋喃唑酮治疗伤寒副伤寒效果较好,特将从1974年1月至1975年2月用呋喃唑酮治疗的42例(伤寒39例副伤寒甲2例副伤寒乙1例),并与过去用氯霉素治疗组作一比较分析。一、临床资料:男20例,女22例。年龄14-25岁27例,26-35岁5例,36-45岁6例,45岁以上4例。接受呋喃唑酮治疗前的病程为:一周内13例,二周内21例,三周内3例,四周内1例,一个月以上4例。二、观察方法1.观察对象:无选择地采用呋喃唑酮治疗42例伤寒副伤寒住院患者。本组诊断依据为:(一)细菌培养阳性6例。(二)虽培养阴性但血清检查肥达氏反应阳性(“O”1:80,“H”1:160以上),
In our hospital since January 1974, furazolidone treatment of typhoid and paratyphoid fever is better, especially from January 1974 to February 1975 with furazolidone treatment of 42 cases (typhoid fever in 39 cases of paratyphoid A paratyphoid B Cases), and with the past chloramphenicol treatment group for a comparative analysis. First, the clinical data: 20 males and 22 females. 27 cases were aged 14-25 years, 5 cases were 26-35 years old, 6 cases were 36-45 years old and 4 cases were 45 years old and older. Furazolidone treatment before the course of disease were: 13 cases within a week, 21 cases within two weeks, three cases within three weeks, four cases within 1 week, more than 4 months. Second, the observation method 1.Objective: No choice to use furazolidone treatment of 42 cases of typhoid and paratyphoid inpatients. The diagnosis is based on: (a) bacterial culture positive in 6 cases. (2) Although the culture is negative but the serum is tested for Widal reaction (“O” 1:80, “H” 1: 160 or more),