王尔德对庄子思想的评论与解读,很容易被想当然地解释为是一位精通东方哲学的思想家所为。实际上,王尔德所有著作中对于庄子的评语是非常有限的。为了理清其中关系,本文试图回归文本语境,呈现王尔德当时所阅读的真实文本,揭示翟理斯的译作与莫尔的哲学评论对他的具体影响。 Wilde’s commentary and interpretation of Chuang Tzu’s thinking can easily be taken as a matter of course by a thinker who masters Eastern philosophy. In fact, all of Wilde’s writings on Chuang Tzu are very limited. In order to clarify the relationship, this article tries to return to the context of texts and present the true texts that Wilders read at that time, revealing the specific influence of the translations of Marcelles and Moore’s philosophical comments on him.