论文部分内容阅读
几天前参加《炎黄春秋》杂志的新春茶话会,到会作者上百人,多数年逾古稀,60岁以下者寥寥无几,好几位发言者都谈到了新老交替的紧迫。这固然是该杂志的特殊情况,但也从一个侧面反映了中国现当代史领域的年龄特点:年长者居多,年轻者较少。但这并不意味着年轻一代没有了解历史真相的愿望,也不能说年轻学者里没有研究中国现当代历史的好手。供职于中国政法大学的陈夏红,
A few days ago to participate in “Spring Huangchunqiu” magazine Spring Tea Party, to the author of hundreds of people, most of the seventies, seventy years of age are few, several speakers spoke of the urgency of alternating old and new. Although this is a special case of this magazine, it also reflects the age characteristics of the field of modern and contemporary Chinese history from one aspect: the majority of the elderly are older and the younger are fewer. However, this does not mean that the younger generation does not have the desire to understand the truth of history, nor can it be said that young scholars do not have the masters who study the history of modern and contemporary China. Chen Xia Hong, who worked for China University of Political Science and Law,