作为凝结调查研究劳动成果的调研报道稿件,由于写作上的某些缺陷,读起来往往觉得沉闷、呆板,不能雅俗共赏,失去了不少读者。这类稿件是否就应该循着那个老套套,搞得沉闷,冗长,不大让人感兴趣呢?不是的。因为生活是生动的,调查研究比一般采访对生活了解得更透彻,调研稿件也理应比一般报道更能使普通读者感兴趣。 1985年以来,我几乎每年都至少参加一项专题调研。在写作上,有的报道确实难以跳出老的版式,但 As a result of investigation of the investigation of labor condensation research articles reported manuscripts, due to some of the writing defects, often feel boring to read, dull, can not be popular, lost a lot of readers. Should this kind of manuscript follow the old style and make it dull, lengthy and not very interesting? No. Because life is vivid, investigation and study understand life more thoroughly than general interviews, and research manuscripts should be of more interest to ordinary readers than general reports. Since 1985, I have attended at least one thematic survey almost every year. In writing, some reports really hard to jump out of the old layout, however