论文部分内容阅读
建立一个全面、完善、公正、科学的中国人文社会科学学术成果评价体系已是当务之急,既是为了从方法论上根本解决现行评价方法所造成的弊端和错误导向,也是为了不错过已经出现的重要发展机遇,推动人文社会科学摆脱以往根底浅薄的被动局面。文章在分析了现行主要评价方法,如同行评议、引文索引、核心期刊等之后,认为中国人文社会科学学术成果评价体系的建立现在面临的困境是旧有的主、客观方法都有较多缺陷,而新的方法还处在实验阶段,新、旧之间的过渡时期还较长,是政出多门、标准不一、事故易发的不稳定阶段。为寻求出路,文章认为当前的做法是重组现行旧方法和实验性方法,在互相关联和牵制中尽量降低彼此缺陷的负面作用,形成“组合效应”;同时从长远发展考虑,要致力于建设一个有利于评价体系良好运行的环境,建立起对学术研究者、学术评议人、学术管理者的有效监督。
Establishing a comprehensive, complete, fair and scientific appraisal system of Chinese academic achievements in humanities and social sciences is a pressing matter of the moment, both in order to fundamentally solve the drawbacks and misguided aspects of the current appraisal methods from the methodology and also to not miss the important opportunities for development that have emerged , To promote the humanities and social sciences from the past, the basic shallow passive situation. After analyzing the main evaluation methods, such as peer review, citation index and core periodicals, the article thinks that the dilemma facing the establishment of evaluation system of humanities and social sciences in China nowadays is that the old master and objective methods all have more defects. The new method is still in the experimental phase, and the transition period between the new one and the old one is still relatively long. It is an unstable phase with many different standards and different incidents. In order to find a way out, the article holds that the current practice is to reorganize the current old methods and experimental methods, minimize the negative effects of each other’s defects in the interrelationship and containment, and form a “combination effect.” At the same time, from the perspective of long-term development, we should devote ourselves to building a It helps to evaluate the system’s well-functioning environment and establish effective supervision of academic researchers, academic reviewers and academic managers.