论文部分内容阅读
United States v.Maynard案及其后续的United States v.Jones案将“镶嵌论”导入刑事诉讼领域,用以判断车载GPS信息等电子监控证据的可采性,在Katz案所确立的搜查标准下针对科技挑战而增添新的分析途径,在“空间”之外,将“时间”也作为判断隐私状态的重要参量,并通过镶嵌论的逻辑方法对某些可以侵入“时间”领域的现代技术进行规制。车载GPS信息具有电子证据、间接证据、踪迹证据等性质特点。作为一种信息协同效应理论和逻辑方法,镶嵌论为业界分析车载GPS证据以及更广泛意义上的电子监控证据的科学可靠性、关联性、合法性等广义可采性的方面提供了崭新的视角,并可以为我国刑事诉讼技术侦查及其证据运用的相关规则提供启示。
The United States v. Maynard case and its successor United States v. Jones case introduced “mosaic theory” into criminal proceedings to determine the admissibility of electronic surveillance evidence such as on-board GPS information. In the case of the search established in the Katz case In addition to “space ”, “time ” is also used as an important parameter to judge the state of privacy, and through the logic of mosaics, Time "field of regulation of modern technology. Car GPS information with electronic evidence, indirect evidence, trace evidence and other characteristics of the nature. As a theoretical and logical approach to information synergies, mosaicism offers a brand new perspective for the industry to analyze in-vehicle GPS evidence and the broader admissibility of scientific evidence, relevance, and legitimacy of electronic surveillance evidence in a broader sense , And can provide enlightenment for the relevant rules of our country’s criminal procedure technology investigation and its evidence application.