Innovation Has Never Been So Important for China

来源 :Beijing Review | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:raoxinyan
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  This year’s government work report gives unprecedented priority to innovation. The global economic system is undergoing its most significant restructuring ever, and economic ties have moved from global production networks to global innovation networks. Innovation is becoming a strategic option to reshape the world economic landscape other than a policy option to avoid crisis.
  China is now entering an economic “new normal,” where the new characteristics of development are becoming increasingly prominent. The model of quantitative expansion is unable to support high growth in such a huge economy, particularly when the demographic dividend is decreasing, production costs are rising and resource allocation efficiency is declining. Today, more than ever, China needs innovation to improve its competitiveness.
  China’s road to the implementation of innovation strategy, however, has never been smooth. There are not only internal pressures but also challenges outside the country. A comparison of total factor productivity (TFP) shows that developed countries of more robust innovation capabilities have achieved a recovery of TFP, which has made considerable contributions to their economic growth.
  The international economic order is now in a new era of transformation, and innovation has been a core strategy for major world economies. While these economies make significant readjustments in innovation strategies, emerging economies such as South Korea, Russia, India and Brazil are also putting forward their own plans for cultivating innovation.
  The United States passed the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Act in 2007, launched A Strategy for American Innovation: Driving Towards Sustainable Growth and Quality Jobs in 2009 and released an updated Strategy for American Innovation in 2011. The EU formulated the European Roadmap for Research Infrastructures in 2006 and Europe 2020 Strategy in 2010. Japan raised new growth strategies in April 2009, planning to develop industries such as the manufacturing of environment-friendly automobiles, electric vehicles and solar power generation. South Korea proposed to develop prospects in the fields of energy and the environment, new information technologies, the bio-industry, production of solar panels, marine biofuel and green cars, as well as other emerging industries.
  All countries are trying to gain ground in the new round of global competition, and the battlefields have diversified, including the war for talented professionals, control of high technologies and invisible trade barriers.   First, almost all countries have formulated plans to introduce and nurture talents to meet future demand, and the war for talent, especially among high-end technology professionals, has intensified. The United States has revised its immigration law several times to attract well-educated migrants worldwide, and the EU adopted the European Blue Card system in May 2009 to attract high-skilled non-EU citizens.
  The globalization of science and technology has resulted in the formation of a global innovation network. International science and technology cooperation has extended from scientific to industrial cooperation, and research and development (R&D) globalization led by multinationals has been further intensified. For U.S. and European multinationals, input in overseas R&D has accounted for over 70 percent of their total R&D input. Meanwhile, developed countries have also strengthened control of high technologies. The United States and the EU have both formulated strict technology supervision systems.
  Under these circumstances, China must lay out its innovation chains surrounding the industrial chains. It should attempt to make breakthroughs in some key technological areas in strategic emerging industries. It can also enhance the capability of traditionally competitive industries to innovate independently and accelerate the upgrading and transformation of these industries.
  China must also promote open innovation and accelerate its integration into the global innovation networks. The allocation of innovation resources tends to be heading in a direction that is increasingly global, and the flow of technologies worldwide is particularly dynamic. The growth of technology trade is faster than the trade in goods and services.
  In the next decade, it is projected that China’s hi-tech market will see an annual growth of 20-40 percent. This means China is likely to become an emerging base of industrial transfer and center for R&D through open innovation and cooperative innovation.
  Against the backdrop of innovation globalization, China must establish a platform for transnational technology transfer and connect Chinese companies to global resources and markets. With the opportunity to open up further, China should accelerate integration into the global innovation networks and establish a policy system to support innovation.
其他文献
【摘 要】随着社会的不断发展,城市化的改革也进入到了新的阶段。特别是在目前条件下,人们对于居住环境不仅仅局限于满足居住的需求,而且对于室内的舒适度和安全性都具有更高的要求。而对于室内装修来说,即是为达到目前人们多元化需求而产生的一个项目,而对于室内装修施工,最大的问题即是在安全性方面,诸如火灾问题、质量问题等等。而研究室内装修施工中的火灾原因及防火策略,将对室内装修行业的发展带来重要的指导意义。 
随着中国教育的发展,如今的高职院校已经成为社会人才输出的重要场所,其中建筑工程造价专业就成了很多同学高考首选专业,促使很多高校开始开设这门专业.但从目前来看,很多高
学科建设是大学音乐教育专业发展的基础,要明确大学音乐教育的培养目标及任务,加强大学音乐教育专业的学科建设,明确学科定位,形成富有自身学科特色、强化优势学科、教学与科
尽管绝大多数企业把“让顾客满意”作为自己的口号与追求目标,但真正在这一领域展开调研的还是少数,而能以严格程序开展调研活动并有效运用调研成果进行经营的企业就更少.本
跨境众筹是国内互联网产业规模化发展处于临界点之际的应然发展趋势,当下中国应当建设跨境众筹法律机制,意在预防该业务陷入互联网产业频发的实务先行,但立法滞后的问题.中国
随着自动化技术的不断发展及应用,电气自动化已成为电气工程建设的重要内容,是推动电气工程现代化的重要保障.相比于传统控制系统,电气自动化实现了更加便捷、快速的调控,确
“恤幼”思想在我国古代未成年人犯罪规范中影响深远.其以年龄划分未成年人刑事责任等做法,对今构建预防未成年犯罪机制仍有借鉴意义.为从根本上降低未成年犯罪率,我们应注重
主要通过对供给侧结构性改革的阐述,提出在供给侧结构性改革中应避免的几种倾向,在加强政府监管的同时,充分发挥企业等微观主体的市场嗅觉作用,通过运用国家宏观调控与市场调
长江经济带要快速崛起,下游产业要向外转移,长江经济带新一轮开放开发及区域协调发展上升为国家发展战略,皖江城市带日益健全的经济体系,将更好的促进长江经济带区域间的协调