论文部分内容阅读
当今世界各国,无论是大陆法系国家还是英美法系国家,一般都要求判决书必须写明理由。判决写明理由的目的是判决正当性的要求。本文通过对两大法系判决理由的比较,并在考察我国判决理由沿革及现状的基础上,提出了两大法系判决理由对我国判决理由的借鉴之处。文章指出,我国的判决书应当强化相关判例中的判决理由的拘束力,强调判决理由的内容,加强对证据的分析和采信的认证过程,注重说理逻辑性,以法论理,注意判决书的正反说理,以及发挥判决理由的心证监督功能。
All countries in the world today, whether they are civil law countries or common law countries, generally require that judgments must be clearly stated. The purpose of the verdict is to decide the justification requirement. Based on the comparison of the reasons of the two legal systems, and on the basis of reviewing the evolution and current status of the reasons for the judgments in our country, this paper puts forward the reference of the reasons for the judgments in our two major legal systems. The article points out that judgments in our country should reinforce the binding force of judgments in the relevant jurisprudence, emphasize the contents of the reasons for the judgments, strengthen the analysis of evidences and the certification process of adhering to the letter, pay attention to the logic of reasoning, justify with law and pay attention to the pros and cons of verdict , As well as the reasons for the judgment of the card supervision function.