论文部分内容阅读
适当的明智的证明责任分配属于法律制度最为必要的或最值得追求的内容,~①因此新修订的2010年版《国家赔偿法》一改1994年版《国家赔偿法》的做法,从无到有的以第15条专门确立行政赔偿诉讼证明责任分配规则,殊值肯定。然而从立法原意来看,该条主要目的在于确定第2款所规定的特定条件下的因果关系证明责任的归属,而不在于一般情况下原被告的证明责任。~②对于后者,从第1款的“赔偿请求人和赔偿义务机关对自己提出的主张,应当提供证据”表述来看,立法者完全是以“谁主
Appropriate and wise distribution of the burden of proof belongs to the legal system is the most necessary or most sought after content, so ① the revised version of the 2010 edition of the State Compensation Act changed the 1994 version of the ”National Compensation Act“ practice from scratch Article 15 establishes the rules for the distribution of responsibility for the proof of administrative compensation law, and the special value is affirmed. However, from the legislative intent, the main purpose of the article is to determine the attribution of the burden of proof of causation under the specific conditions provided for in paragraph 2, rather than the burden of proof of the plaintiff under normal circumstances. ~ ② For the latter, from the ”compensation claims and compensation agencies“ in paragraph 1, they should provide evidence for their claims. ”According to the formulation, the legislator is based entirely on"